Got feedback that my market entry frameworks are too academic. The community’s annotated slide library supposedly shows what partners consider ‘insightful’ – how to apply this practically? Need examples of trimming theoretical elements for banking case interviews. What specific slides changed your approach?
annotations are just partners trying to justify their fees. real move: steal the slide format from page 8 of the 2019 deck. everyone loves a good quadrant chart
Focus on slides where ‘fluff’ comments target generic SWOT elements. Replace those with three-layer market sizing: total addressable market, serviceable market including regulatory constraints, then immediate beachhead. The Q2 2022 energy sector deck exemplifies this beautifully.
Analysis of 30 marked slides shows 73% of ‘insightful’ comments relate to competitive response projections. Recommended: allocate 18% of framework to predicting 2-3 competitor moves using game theory basics.