I’ve been grinding through case frameworks religiously, but during mock interviews, I keep getting feedback that my approach feels too robotic when real-world complications pop up. How do experienced consultants tweak textbook frameworks for unpredictable scenarios? Any examples where bending the rules actually impressed interviewers?
The key is understanding that frameworks are tools, not scripts. In my consulting days, I always started with standard structures but kept mental flexibility points. For example, when a profitability case had unexpected regulatory factors, I adjusted the cost-revenue model on the fly by adding a risk buffer. Interviewers want to see you recognize when the map doesn’t match the terrain.
lol ‘frameworks’. They train you to be a parrot then get surprised when you squawk preset answers. pro tip: steal actual war stories from consultants’ post-mortems here. last week saw a breakdown where someone used a pricing framework BUT added local labor laws – instant offer. frameworks are just alibis for creativity
Analysis of 23 peer-reviewed case breakdowns shows 78% modified standard frameworks. Common adaptations: adding 2-3 custom nodes to MECE structures (e.g., regulatory wildcards in profitability cases), and hybrid frameworks merging Porter’s Five Forces with SWOT for tech cases. Always cite a logical reason for deviations during interviews.
wait so its ok to not follow the framework strictly?? had no idea! gonna try adding like a ‘external factors’ section next mock. thx!
You’ve got this! Flexibility is a skill – every tweak shows critical thinking. Keep practicing!