How do veterans tactfully push back against scope creep without burning bridges?

I’m three months into my first PM role and already getting crushed by ‘just one more feature’ requests from every direction. Senior folks always talk about setting boundaries, but real talk—how do you actually say no without sounding like you’re shutting people down? What frameworks or war stories from your experience made stakeholders want to align with your priorities? Bonus points for examples where saying no actually improved the outcome.

lol ‘tactfully’. newsflash: stakeholders don’t care about your frameworks. i’ve found attaching a $$ tag to every ‘quick win’ works best. last month sales demanded a button that’d take 3 sprints—i showed them the cost vs projected rev. suddenly it wasn’t so urgent. play their game.

i literally screenshot this thread for later. My lead keeps adding stuff mid-sprint and im scared to push back. gonna try that $$ idea but what if they ask where i got the numbers??

Two tactics that scale: 1) Co-create the prioritization rubric with stakeholders early. When requests pile up, refer back to the criteria they helped build. 2) Redirect enthusiasm: “That’s a strong idea—let’s slot it into Q3 validation once we hit the current KPIs.” Depersonalizes the ‘no’.

You’ve got this! Frame it as ‘not now’ vs ‘no’—keeps doors open :handshake:

Had a VP demand we add blockchain to a recipe app ‘for innovation’. I set up a 5-min gut-check meeting with eng leads, who laughed it out. Sometimes letting reality check come from others saves your neck. Still cringe at that phase though.