How deep do desk-specific ‘why M&A’ examples need to go without overstepping NDAs?

Using the motivation builder’s examples for Goldman interviews, but worried about sounding too generic vs. too insider. The JPM template I practiced with got called ‘recycled’ in a mock. For those who succeeded: How specific should we get with deal examples? How do you balance public knowledge with demonstrating genuine group interest?

please. as if 1st years know real deal details. trick is to steal pitchbook headlines then pretend you’ve ‘studied the value creation levers’. my ‘why M&A’ was 60% rehashed press releases + 40% buzzwords. MD ate it up – they just want proof you can fake sector passion for 80hr weeks.

Data point: 89% of analysts reference deals older than 18mo to avoid NDA issues. Recommend citing regulatory filings (e.g., ‘Post-Synergy projections from the X-Y merger’) rather than live deals. Structure commentary around public financial metrics to demonstrate analytical rigor without confidentiality breaches.

My buddy name-dropped a niche Goldman healthcare deal from 2019 – turns out his interviewer led that exact transaction. Got grilled on specifics but recovered by pivoting to broader sector trends. Moral: Have 3-tier prep – 1 public deal, 1 industry theme, 1 personal connective thread (alma mater, etc).