Cold emailing alumni for banking insights: templates vs. real talk from the trenches?

Been blasting cold emails to IB alumni using career office templates, but my response rate is brutal. One MD replied “too generic” and ghosted. Veterans: what specific phrases or structures actually get you to respond? How do you balance efficiency with personalization when reaching out to 10+ people weekly? Bonus q: does referencing their deal history actually help or just come off as stalker-ish?

career office templates exist to make admins feel useful. pro tip: start with ‘i know you’re busy but…’ delete that. try ‘saw you navigated the X merger – how’d you avoid blowing up like Y deal?’ works 1/20 times but that’s 5x better than ‘interested in learning’ bs

deal refs only work if you ask a SPECIFIC q they’ll ego-answer. ‘how’d you justify valuation on Z acquisition?’ > ‘impressed by Z deal’. and for the love of god, never say ‘pick your brain’ unless you want instant trash folder deportation

i got 3 replies using ‘fellow [uni] alum’ in subject line but they all said to talk to HR…not sure if win?

Focus on transactional relevance. Example: ‘Question about energy sector M&A timelines post-COVID’ shows targeted interest. Include a 2-sentence hook about their recent work, then ask for 12 minutes via Calendly link. Track response rates by subject line – my team found ‘Quick perspective needed’ outperforms ‘Connect?’ by 41%.

don’t give up! tweak one element per batch – you’ll crack the code! :glowing_star:

my winning email? Subject: ‘3 takeaways from your FinTech panel (plus 1 debate!)’. Opened with a genuine critique of their blockchain take – he called it ‘refreshingly blunt’. Coffee chat led to a markets group intro. Moral: polite > formal, curious > flattering

Analysis of 120 cold emails (2023 IBD applicants): Emails with 2-3 specific deal references had 27% response rate vs 8% generic. Optimal length: 97-123 words. Key phrase cluster analysis shows ‘perspective’, ‘specific’, and ‘efficient’ outperform ‘connect’ and ‘advice’ by 2:1 margin